4.5 Article

Effect of R-phase Heat Treatment on Torsional Resistance and Cyclic Fatigue Fracture

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 389-393

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.028

关键词

Cyclic fatigue; K3XF; NiTi rotary file; R-phase heat treatment; torsional resistance

资金

  1. Kyungpook National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the resistance to torsional stress and cyclic fatigue would be improved by the novel R-phase heat treatment by using instruments with identical geometric characteristics. Methods: K3XF and K3 files with sizes of #30/.04 and #30/.06 were selected for the study (n = 10 per group). To evaluate the torsional resistance, the torsional load and distortion angle at yield, ultimate, and fracture points were recorded. The toughness until fracture was calculated as well. The number of cycles to failure for each instrument was determined to evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance. Statistical analysis was performed by using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test (for torsional resistance) and independent t test (for cyclic fatigue). After torsional and cyclic fatigue tests, all fractured fragments were observed under a scanning electron microscope to evaluate the topographic features of the fractured surfaces. Results: Although K3XF showed superior cyclic fatigue resistance to K3 (P < .000), there was no significant difference in torsional resistance in terms of ultimate strength, fracture angle, and toughness between the 2 brands of K3XF and K3 regardless of the instruments' taper. The fractured cross-sectional surfaces showed typical features of cyclic fatigue and torsional fractures. K3XF had a distinctive surface with numerous irregular micropores. Conclusions: The heat-treated K3XF instruments that used R-phase heat treatment technology showed improved cyclic fatigue resistance without decline of torsional strength. (J Ended 2013;39:389-393)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据