4.5 Article

Anandamide Induces Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Production through Cannabinoid-1 Receptor and Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-1 in Human Dental Pulp Cells in Culture

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 786-790

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.025

关键词

Anandamide; cannabinoid receptor; human dental pulp cells; matrix metalloproteinase-2; mitogen-activated protein kinase; transient receptor potential vanilloid-1

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan [22592125, 22592124]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22592124, 22592125] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Anandamide (N-arachidonoylethanolamine [AEA]) is one of the main endocannabinoids. Endocannabinoids are implicated in various physiological and pathologic functions, inducing not only nociception but also regeneration and inflammation. The role of the endocannabinoid system in peripheral organs was recently described. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of AEA on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 induction in human dental pulp cells (HPC). Methods: We examined AEA-induced MMP-2 production and the expression of AEA receptors (cannabinoid [CB] receptor-1, CB2, and transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 [TRPV1]) in HPC by Western blot. MMP-2 concentrations in supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We then investigated the role of the AEA receptors and mitogen-activated protein kinase in AEA-induced MMP-2 production in HPC. Results: AEA significantly induced MMP-2 production in HPC. HPC expressed all 3 types of AEA receptor (CB1, CB2, and TRPV1). AEA-induced MMP-2 production was blocked by CB1 or TRPV1 antagonists and by small interfering RNA for CB1 or TRPV1. Furthermore, c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitor also reduced MMP-2 production. Conclusions: We demonstrated for the first time that AEA induced MMP-2 production via CB1 and TRPV1 in HPC. (J Endod 2012;38:786-790)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据