4.5 Article

Sex Differences in Neuropeptide Content and Release from Rat Dental Pulp

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 1098-1101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.007

关键词

Calcitonin gene-related peptide; dental pulp; hyperalgesia; nerve growth factor; neuropeptide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Studies to examine sex differences in response to pain have suggested that females exhibit lower threshold responses to painful stimuli and that threshold response varies greatly at different stages of the menstrual cycle. Additional studies suggest that sex differences may be caused by societal sex roles or differences in anxiety responses by men and women. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate biologically evident sex differences in male and female rats chronically treated with a systemic algogen, the nerve growth factor (NGF), by measuring neuropeptides (calcitonin gene-related peptide) content and release from isolated dental pulp. Methods: Rats were injected subcutaneously every other day with either murine NGF (1 mg/kg) or vehicle for 7 or 13 days. Isolated incisor pulp tissue was evaluated from these male and female rats (n = 96). Capsaicin-evoked neurosecretion of CGRP and tissue content were measured using a previously validated radioimmunoassay. Results: Dental pulp from female rats at 7 days showed significantly increased capsaicin-evoked immunoreactive CGRP release (>50% increase) compared with tissue from male rats. After 13 days, this release was significantly increased only in NGF-treated female rats (3-fold increase) when compared with control females or both male groups. The CGRP content in tissue from both female groups was also significantly increased after 7 days of treatment (>3 fold), but after 13 days this content was only significantly increased in tissue from NGF-treated female rats (P = .0001). Conclusions: These data suggest that sex differences affect the role of NGF in the modulation of inflammation through the regulation of peripheral neuropeptide release and content. (J Endod 2011;37:1098-1101)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据