4.5 Review

Critical Review on Methacrylate Resin-based Root Canal Sealers

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 36, 期 3, 页码 383-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.023

关键词

Biocompatibility; evidence-based; fracture resistance; methacrylate resin-based sealers; monoblocks; removability; sealing ability; self-etching potential

资金

  1. Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Four generations of methacrylate resin based sealers have been available commercially. Three of these were introduced during the last 5 years when the concept of simultaneous bonding of root canal sealers to root filling materials and dentin was popularized. Methods: This article presents an overview of methacrylate resin based sealers, with the objectives of clarifying the behavior of these materials and delineating their limitations in clinical application. Results: The first generation sealer was introduced in the mid-1970s. The initial enthusiasm associated with its use eventually diminished as a result of its suboptimal physical, biologic, and clinical properties. With advances in self-etching adhesive technology acquired from adhesive dentistry, methacrylate resin based sealers were reintroduced in the beginning of the 21st century to support the introduction of bondable root canal filling materials. Three different generations of these sealers have since been available commercially. Although some in vitro studies on the sealing ability, self-etching potential, biocompatibility, and removability of the sealers showed better potential over conventional nonbonding sealers, accomplishing the ideal goal of a monoblock in the root canal space with these materials is still regarded as a major challenge. Conclusions: On the basis of the in vitro and in vivo data available to date, there appears to be no clear benefit with the use of methacrylate resin based sealers in conjunction with adhesive root filling materials at this point in their development. (J Ended 2010;36:383-399)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据