4.5 Article

Effect of Age and Extrinsic Microenvironment on the Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Rat Dental Pulp Stem Cells In Vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 1546-1553

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.016

关键词

Age; dental pulp stem cell; microenvironment; osteogenic differentiation; proliferation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: It is suggested that dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) possess pluripotent differentiation and self-renewal capacity and play a crucial role in maintaining dental pulp homeostasis. However, little is known about the age-related changes of DPSCs, and whether aging and its microenvironment are associated with DPSCs remains a question. In this study, age-related changes in proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability of rat DPSCs were assessed. Methods: To examine the influence of microenvironment factors on different ages of DPSCs, we exposed adult rat DPSCs to juvenile rat dental pulp cell-conditioned medium (DPC-CM), and juvenile DPSCs were exposed to adult DPC-CM. Morphologic appearance, colony-forming assay, cell cycle analysis, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thyazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium, gene expression, and mineralization assay after osteogenic induction of DPSCs were evaluated. Results: DPSCs isolated from the juvenile donors displayed increased proliferation and decreased osteogenic differentiation ability compared with the adult DPSCs. Interestingly, adult DPSCs induced by juvenile DPC-CM demonstrated enhanced proliferation but decreased osteogenic differentiation ability, whereas DPSCs from juvenile donors induced by adult DPC-CM showed decreased proliferation but enhanced osteogenic differentiation ability. Conclusions: Our data suggest that age-related changes of DPSCs should be taken into account when DPSCs are intended to be used for investigations and application. Furthermore, the activity of DPSCs can be modulated by the extrinsic microenvironment. (J Endod 2009,35:1546-1553)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据