4.7 Article

The ubiquitin ligase Siah2 regulates obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation

期刊

OBESITY
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 2223-2232

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/oby.21220

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIDDK) [5R56DK89020, 1R01DK099625]
  2. COBRE center from National Institutes of Health [NIH 8P20-GM103528]
  3. NORC center from National Institutes of Health [NIH 2P30-DK072476]
  4. National Institutes of Health [DK097153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveChronic, low-grade adipose tissue inflammation associated with adipocyte hypertrophy is an important link in the relationship between obesity and insulin resistance. Although ubiquitin ligases regulate inflammatory processes, the role of these enzymes in metabolically driven adipose tissue inflammation is relatively unexplored. Herein, the effect of the ubiquitin ligase Siah2 on obesity-related adipose tissue inflammation was examined. MethodsWild-type and Siah2KO mice were fed a low- or high-fat diet for 16 weeks. Indirect calorimetry, body composition, and glucose and insulin tolerance were assayed along with glucose and insulin levels. Gene and protein expression, immunohistochemistry, adipocyte size distribution, and lipolysis were also analyzed. ResultsEnlarged adipocytes in obese Siah2KO mice were not associated with obesity-induced insulin resistance. Proinflammatory gene expression, stress kinase signaling, fibrosis, and crown-like structures were reduced in the Siah2KO adipose tissue, and Siah2KO adipocytes were more responsive to insulin-dependent inhibition of lipolysis. Loss of Siah2 increased expression of PPAR target genes involved in lipid metabolism and decreased expression of proinflammatory adipokines regulated by PPAR. ConclusionsSiah2 links adipocyte hypertrophy with adipocyte dysfunction and recruitment of proinflammatory immune cells to adipose tissue. Selective regulation of PPAR activity is a Siah2-mediated mechanism contributing to obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据