4.6 Article

Prospective evaluation of tumor size and hormonal status in adrenal incidentalomas

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03346546

关键词

Adrenal; incidentaloma; follow-up; radiological; hormonal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Because of the increased use of imaging interventions, more subjects have been diagnosed with adrenal incidentaloma in recent years. Aim: To evaluate the risk of mass enlargement, hormone hypersecretion and development of adrenal carcinomas during short-term follow-up. Subjects and methods: There were 317 subjects with incidentally discovered adrenal tumors in the registry. Forty subjects were excluded because of clinically overt hormone secretion at diagnosis and subjects with complete data were included in radiological (no.=150) and hormonal (no.=150) follow-up. Radiological evaluation was performed with computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There were 143 subjects with adrenal adenomas and 7 subjects with other tumor types (cyst or myelolipoma). Median follow-up duration was 24 months. Results: Increase in tumor size was detected in 25 subjects (17.4%) with adenomas and 1 subject with adrenal myelolipoma (14.3%). Decrease in tumor size was found in 7 subjects (4.8%) with adrenal adenomas. One patient was diagnosed with adrenocortical carcinoma during follow-up. In subjects with non-functioning adrenal adenoma (NFA, no.=120) or subclinical Cushing syndrome (sCS) (no.=30), no subject developed clinically overt hormone hypersecretion, while 8 (6%) subjects in the NFA group developed sCS. Tumor diameter and follow-up duration were significantly higher in subjects who developed sCS. Conclusion: In conclusion, we demonstrated that, despite being infrequent, adrenal tumors may increase in size, develop overt or subclinical hormone secretion or feature malignant transformation. Therefore, radiological and hormonal follow-up should be recommended to the patients. More investigations are needed for the establishment of long-term follow-up protocols. (J. Endocrinol. Invest. 33: 32-36, 2010) (c) 2010, Editrice Kurtis

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据