4.6 Review

Evidence of the effectiveness of flour fortification programs on iron status and anemia: a systematic review

期刊

NUTRITION REVIEWS
卷 73, 期 11, 页码 780-795

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv037

关键词

enrichment; ferritin; hemoglobin; maize flour; wheat flour

资金

  1. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
  2. CDC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. More than 80 countries fortify flour, yet the public health impact of this intervention on iron and anemia outcomes has not been reviewed. Objective. The objective of this systematic review was to review published and gray literature pertaining to the impact of flour fortification on iron and anemia. Data Sources. A systematic review was conducted by searching 17 databases and appealing for unpublished reports, yielding 1881 documents. Study Selection. Only studies of government-supported, widely implemented fortification programs in which anemia or iron status was measured prior to and >= 12 months after initiation of fortification were included. Data Extraction. Details about the design, coverage, compliance with national standards, and evaluation (e.g., anemia prevalence before and after fortification) of flour fortification programs were extracted from the reports. Data Synthesis. Thirteen studies describing 26 subgroups (n = 14 for children <= 15 y, n = 12 for women of reproductive age) were included. During the period from pre- to postfortification (and as difference-in-difference for those studies that included a control group), there were statistically significant decreases in the prevalence of anemia in 4 of 13 subgroups of children and in 4 of 12 subgroups of women of reproductive age as well as significant decreases in the prevalence of low ferritin in 1 of 6 subgroups of children and in 3 of 3 subgroups of women of reproductive age. Conclusions. Evidence of the effectiveness of flour fortification for reducing the prevalence of anemia is limited; however, evidence of effectiveness for reducing the prevalence of low ferritin in women is more consistent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据