4.5 Article

Consumption of a high glycemic load but not a high glycemic index diet is marginally associated with oxidative stress in young women

期刊

NUTRITION RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 7-13

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.10.005

关键词

Glycemic index; Young women; Glycemic load; Isoprostanes; Overweight

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [1U54CA116849-010003]
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Center for Research Resources [M01-RR00400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research studies have suggested that chronic consumption of high glycemic index foods may lead to chronically high oxidative stress. This is important because oxidative stress is suspected to be an early event in the etiology of many disease processes. We hypothesized that dietary glycemic index and glycemic load were positively associated with oxidative stress assessed by plasma F-2-isoprostanes in healthy, premenopausal women (body mass index [BMI] = 24.7 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2) and age 25.3 +/- 3.5 years, mean +/- SD). We measured plasma F-2-isoprostanes in 306 healthy premenopausal women at the baseline visit for the Women In Steady Exercise Research study, using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Dietary glycemic index and load were calculated from the National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire, and participants were divided into quartiles of dietary glycemic index and of glycemic load. Plasma F2-isoprostanes were compared across quartile groups of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load using linear regression models. Plasma F-2-isoprostanes (pg/mL) increased with quartile of glycemic load (test for linear trend, P =.033), and also increased with quartile of glycemic index in participants with BMI >= 25 (P =.035) but not in those with BMI <25 (P =.924). After adjustment for BMI, alcohol consumption and total energy intake, both these positive trends remained marginally significant (P =.123 for quartiles of glycemic index and P =.065 for quartiles of glycemic load). (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据