4.3 Article

The interpretation of abdominal wall muscle recruitment strategies change when the electrocardiogram (ECG) is removed from the electromyogram (EMG)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 E102-E113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.10.004

关键词

Electrocardiogram; Electromyography; Trunk muscles; Simulation; Criterion methodology

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (NSHRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the ECG artifact on low-level trunk muscle activation amplitudes and assess the effectiveness of two methods used to remove the ECG. Simulations were performed and percent error in root mean square (RMS) amplitudes were calculated from uncontaminated and contaminated EMG signals at various ECG to EMG ratios. Two methods were used to remove the ECG: (1) filtering by adaptive sampling (FAS) and (2) Butterworth high pass filter at 30 Hz (BW-30 Hz HPF). The percent error was also calculated between the ECG removed and the uncontaminated EMG RMS amplitudes. Next, the BW-30 Hz HPF method was used to remove the ECG from 3-bilateral external oblique (EO) muscle sites collected from 30 healthy subjects performing a one handed lift and replace task. Two separate ANOVA models assessed the effects of ECG on the statistical interpretation of EO recruitment strategies. One model included EMG data that contained the ECG and the other model included EMG data after the ECG was removed. Large percent errors were observed when the ECG was not removed. These errors increased with larger ECG to EMG ratios. Both removal methods reduced the errors to below 10%, but the BW-30 Hz HPF method was more time efficient in removing the ECG artifact. Different statistical findings were observed among the muscle sites for the ECG contaminated model compared to the ECG removed model, which resulted in different conclusions concerning neuromuscular control. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据