4.4 Article

Antenatal Microbiome Potential Contributor to Fetal Programming and Establishment of the Microbiome in Offspring

期刊

NURSING RESEARCH
卷 64, 期 4, 页码 306-319

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000101

关键词

antenatal; microbiome; microbiota; neonate

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Endogenous and exogenous exposures during fetal development have potential to impact birth and health outcomes of offspring. Accumulating evidence suggests exposures may alter the antenatal microbiome and subsequently alter the microbiome and health of offspring. Objectives The purpose of this integrative review is to summarize and critically evaluate the current state of knowledge regarding the assessment of the antenatal microbiome on the health of human offspring. The article provides a brief summary of the known factors affecting the human microbiome and studies that assessed relationships between the antenatal microbiome and health outcomes of the offspring. Methods An integrative review was conducted to examine human research studies that focused on the antenatal microbiome and the health of the offspring using the electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE and CINAHL from 2004 to the present. Results In addition to the known individual factors that are associated with establishment of the microbiome, the results of the integrative review suggest that medications (including antibiotics) and comorbidities (including infectious diseases, diet, socioeconomic status, and exposure to pollutants) should also be measured. Discussion The composition of the antenatal microbiome at various time points and body sites may be important mediators of short- and long-term health outcomes in offspring. In order to advance our understanding of the role of the antenatal microbiome on health and disease risk of the offspring, it will be important to further elucidate the composition of a healthy microbiome and specific mechanisms that contribute to altered health in later life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据