4.8 Article

DASHR: database of small human noncoding RNAs

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 D1, 页码 D216-D222

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1188

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM099962]
  2. National Institute on Aging [U24-AG041689, U01-AG032984]
  3. Penn Alzheimer's Disease Center [P30-AG10124]
  4. National Science Foundation [MCB-1053846]
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1053846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) are highly abundant RNAs, typically <100 nucleotides long, that act as key regulators of diverse cellular processes. Although thousands of sncRNA genes are known to exist in the human genome, no single database provides searchable, unified annotation, and expression information for full sncRNA transcripts and mature RNA products derived from these larger RNAs. Here, we present the Database of small human noncoding RNAs (DASHR). DASHR contains the most comprehensive information to date on human sncRNA genes and mature sncRNA products. DASHR provides a simple user interface for researchers to view sequence and secondary structure, compare expression levels, and evidence of specific processing across all sncRNA genes and mature sncRNA products in various human tissues. DASHR annotation and expression data covers all major classes of sncRNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs), Piwi-interacting (piRNAs), small nuclear, nucleolar, cytoplasmic (sn-, sno-, scRNAs, respectively), transfer (tRNAs), and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). Currently, DASHR (v1.0) integrates 187 smRNA highthroughput sequencing (smRNA-seq) datasets with over 2.5 billion reads and annotation data from multiple public sources. DASHR contains annotations for similar to 48 000 human sncRNA genes and mature sncRNA products, 82% of which are expressed in one or more of the curated tissues. DASHR is available at http://lisanwanglab.org/DASHR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据