4.3 Review

An update on drug-drug interactions with biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 87-89

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2013.825041

关键词

psoriasis; biologics; drug interactions; systemic therapy; internal therapy; concomitant medications

资金

  1. Abbott Laboratories
  2. AbbVie
  3. Amgen
  4. Pfizer
  5. National Institutes of Health [K08AR057763]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Moderate-to-severe psoriasis is a chronic skin condition that often requires systemic therapy and biologics are the newest systemic treatment available. A favorable aspect of biologics is that they are thought to have minimal risks for drug-drug interactions compared to oral systemic medications such as cyclosporine and methotrexate. However, this assumption has not been recently or adequately reviewed. We reviewed the literature to identify possible drug-drug interactions with biologics and other medications. Methods: We searched PubMed for published case reports, clinical studies, reviews, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labels discussing possible drug-drug interactions with biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Results: There were only a small number of published articles describing drug-drug interactions with biologics. Our review identified two case reports, five clinical studies, and three pharmacokinetics reviews. The majority of articles did not observe clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with biologics. FDA labels do suggest a possible relationship between tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors and cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity. Conclusion: The paucity of information regarding drug-drug interactions reaffirms the idea that biologics have limited susceptibility to drug-drug interactions compared to other oral medications. Further studies are needed to adequately assess drug-drug interactions with biologics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据