4.3 Article

Early development and qualitative evidence of content validity for the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI), a patient-reported outcome measure of psoriasis symptom severity

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 255-260

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2012.759639

关键词

psoriasis; symptom; patient-reported outcome; content validity

资金

  1. Amgen Inc.
  2. Abbott
  3. Amgen
  4. Janssen
  5. Lilly
  6. Celgene
  7. Centocor (Janssen)
  8. Immune Control
  9. Novo Nordisk
  10. UCB
  11. Novartis
  12. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To develop and assess content validity of the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI), a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure of psoriasis symptoms. Methods: Following initial literature exploration and input from experts, concept elicitation was conducted in two rounds (focus groups and individual interviews) with 59 subjects with mild to severe psoriasis. Transcripts were coded to identify symptom concepts and develop a conceptual framework using ATLAS.ti software. Qualitative content analysis and clinical expert input supported item generation and development of a draft measure. Two rounds of face-to-face cognitive interviews with 40 subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis were conducted to test subject comprehension and content coverage. Results: Concepts of itching, scaling, flaking, tearing/cracking, burning, stinging, pain, bleeding and color of appearance were the most common symptom-related expressions. Saturation of concept was demonstrated. Severity was identified as the most meaningful attribute of psoriasis symptoms. A final 8-item measure was developed to assess patient-perceived symptom severity for itch, pain, burning, stinging, cracking, scaling, flaking and redness. Twenty-four-hour recall and 7-day recall versions were prepared for future quantitative assessment of measurement properties. Conclusions: The PSI is a short, low burden, patient-reported measure of psoriasis symptom severity with documented evidence of content validity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据