4.3 Review

Etanercept provides an effective, safe and flexible short- and long-term treatment regimen for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a systematic review of current evidence

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 199-208

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2012.713462

关键词

efficacy; etanercept; long-term treatment; psoriasis; TNF

资金

  1. Pfizer, Italy
  2. Meda
  3. Lohmann Rauscher
  4. ConvaTec
  5. Pfizer
  6. 3M
  7. Astellas
  8. Almirall
  9. Novartis
  10. Abbott
  11. Janssen
  12. GSK
  13. Schering-Plough
  14. Wyeth
  15. Leo Pharma
  16. Merck-Serono
  17. MSD
  18. UCB
  19. Celgene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The treatment of psoriasis requires long-lasting intervention. Conventional treatments for psoriasis comprise topical, phototherapeutic and systemic modalities, such as methotrexate or cyclosporine. Biological therapies are advocated by treatment guidelines for the use in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, when conventional treatments have failed, are contraindicated or are associated with severe adverse events. Etanercept is an anti-TNF recombinant fusion protein that has emerged as a standard biologic treatment option for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The present review summarizes data from pivotal and post-marketing randomized controlled etanercept trials to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis for 24 weeks and longer. During the first 12 weeks, etanercept can be administered in different dosing regimens: 50 mg twice weekly (BIW) and 50 mg once weekly. Although both regimens are effective, it has been shown that the 50 mg BIW dosage leads to higher response rates at week 24. In addition, after 24 weeks' treatment etanercept provides the unique possibility of continuous or intermittent long-term treatment programmes. The medium-to long-term efficacy of etanercept was consistent, regardless of whether etanercept therapy was interrupted or continuous. Taking the chronic nature of psoriasis into account, this flexibility in dosing regimen bestows a key advantage in facilitating individualisation of long-term treatment according to patient needs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据