4.7 Article

Wnt/β-catenin inhibits dental pulp stem cell differentiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 126-130

出版社

INT AMER ASSOC DENTAL RESEARCHI A D R/A A D R
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700206

关键词

Wnt; mineralization; stem cell; dental pulp; osteopontin

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [F30 DE019577, T32DE 007057, R01 DE016513, R01DE 016513, F30 DE019577-01, T32 DE007057] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are a unique precursor population isolated from post-natal human dental pulp and have the ability to regenerate a reparative dentin-like complex. Canonical Wnt signaling plays a critical role in tooth development and stem cell self-renewal through beta-catenin. In this study, the regulation of odontoblast-like differentiation of DPSCs by canonical Wnt signaling was examined. DPSCs were stably transduced with canonical Wnt-1 or the active form of beta-catenin, with retrovirus-mediated infection. Northern blot analysis found that Wnt-1 strongly induced the expression of matricellular protein osteopontin, and modestly enhanced the expression of type I collagen in DPSCs. Unexpectedly, Wnt-1 inhibited alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and the formation of mineralized nodules in DPSCs. Moreover, overexpression of beta-catenin was also sufficient to suppress the differentiation and mineralization of DPSCs. In conclusion, our results suggest that canonical Wnt signaling negatively regulates the odontoblast-like differentiation of DPSCs. Abbreviations used: DPSC, dental pulp stem cell; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; BSP, bone sialoprotein; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; beta-GP, beta-glycerophosphate; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; GSK-3 beta, glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta; LRP, LDL receptor-related protein; Tcf, T-cell factor; LEF, lymphoid enhancer factor; FCS, fetal calf serum; AA, L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate; alpha-MEM, alpha-modified Eagle's medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HA, hemagglutinin; ON, osteonectin; OPN, osteopontin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据