4.4 Article

Evolution of the faceting, morphology and aspect ratio of gallium oxide nanowires grown by vapor-solid deposition

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 24-32

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.03.037

关键词

Crystal morphology; Nanostructures; Growth from vapor; Growth models; Semiconducting gallium compounds; Phosphors

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [3419192010]
  2. Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation [ER10-07-104]
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation [CFI-LOF 204782]
  4. Canada Research Chairs program
  5. NSERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gallium oxide nanostructures with high aspect ratio and variable faceting were synthesized by the chemical vapor deposition method via vapor-solid growth mechanism. Systematic investigation of the growth conditions revealed that these nanowires can be produced under the conditions of high temperature and low precursor flow. The nanowires crystalize as the beta-phase Ga2O3, which has the monoclinic crystal structure. Preferred growth was along the [0 1 0] direction, as corroborated with lattice-resolved imaging and crystal plane models. The high degree of faceting is discussed in terms of the evolution of the nanowire cross section morphology, based on the growth rate of the facet boundaries relative to the nanowire surface planes. The obtained nanowires show intense blue emission, characterized by a broad-band photoluminescence spectrum with a maximum at 430 nm and long decay time This emission arises from the defect-related donor-acceptor pair recombination mechanism, and depends on the nanostructure dimensionality and morphology. The possible influence of controlled nanowire faceting on the observed optical properties is also discussed. Owing to their morphologydependent optical properties, these nanowires are promising building blocks for electronic and optoelectronic structures and devices. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据