4.1 Article

COMPARISON OF FIRST YEAR GROWTH AMONG FIELD, HATCHERY-AND LABORATORY-RAISED JUVENILE RED KING CRAB, PARALITHODES CAMTSCHATICUS (TILESIUS, 1815), IN ALASKA

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 3, 页码 319-325

出版社

CRUSTACEAN SOC
DOI: 10.1163/1937240X-00002228

关键词

carapace length; ecdysis; enhancement; molt; spine length

资金

  1. Alaska Sea Grant College Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an effort to better understand juvenile growth in the first year and to determine potential effects of hatchery larval rearing, we compared growth of juvenile red king crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus (Tilesius, 1815), in the field and under laboratory-rearing conditions. Glaucothoe were obtained from the Alutiiq Pride Shellfish Hatchery and field; once molted to first stage juveniles, both sets were raised individually in the laboratory under ambient conditions (hereafter called hatchery/laboratory-reared and wild/laboratory-reared, respectively) and measured at each molt. Field-surveyed juveniles were observed and measured monthly in the intertidal in Juneau, AK, USA. Size, molt interval, cumulative molt interval, and molt increment did not differ significantly between hatchery/laboratory-reared and wild/laboratory-reared crab or between male and female crab over one year. Crab reached an average size +/- SD of 13.6 +/- 2.1 mm CL after 10-11 molts/year with 24% average molt increment at ambient temperatures. Carapace lengths of hatchery/laboratory-reared, wild/laboratory-reared, and field-surveyed juveniles were not significantly different in five of eight months from January through August, with small differences in January, February, and May, likely resulting from differences in hatch timing. Spine lengths differed from January through March but not from April through August. Spine lengths of hatchery/laboratory-reared crab were significantly larger than fieldsurveyed crab from January through March. Wild/laboratory-reared crab had significantly longer spine lengths than field-surveyed crab in February and March. In conclusion, growth did not differ significantly among juveniles reared in the laboratory and from the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据