4.5 Article

A pair analysis of the delayed graft function in kidney recipient: The critical role of the donor

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 582-590

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.02.011

关键词

Brain death; Organ donor; Delayed graft function; H1 Nuclear magnetic resonance; Ischemia reperfusion; Renal transplantation

资金

  1. PHRC regional from CHU de Poitiers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the importance of donor factors and especially the potential role of hemodynamic management in regard to delayed graft function in paired kidney recipient patients after renal transplantation and to analyze the urine of organ donors by proton-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to identify urine markers potentially correlated with delayed graft function in recipient patients Methods A prospective multicenter epidemiologic study was conducted A logistic regression model taking into account paired data was used Results Data from 72 donors and the 144 corresponding paired recipients were analyzed Univariate analysis showed that age of donor previous history of tobacco ischemic cause of brain death, norepinephrine infusion, and recipient age were the risk factors for delayed graft function After adjusting for correlated outcome data and controlling for other potential prognostic factors 3 variables remained significantly associated with outcome donor age (odds ratio [OR], 10 7), hemodynamic status (OR 0 167), and hydroxyl ethyl starch infusion (OR, 0 135) Proton-nuclear magnetic resonance analysis evidenced 3 metabolites of interest in donors (trimethylamine N oxide, citrate, and lactate) However, these peaks were not correlated the clinical parameters in donors Conclusions Paired analysis of kidney transplantation emphasizes the important role of factor donor associated with delayed graft function in recipient Thus, a particular attention should be paid to the hemodynamic management of donor (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据