4.5 Article

An electrochemical investigation of TMJ implant metal alloys in an artificial joint fluid environment: The influence of pH variation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 1052-1061

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.029

关键词

Electrochemistry; TMJ; Titanium; Alloy CoCrMo alloy; Corrosion; Artificial joint fluid

资金

  1. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the corrosion behaviour of commonly used TMJ implants alloys (CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V) under simulated physiological conditions. Methods: Corrosion behaviour was evaluated using standard electrochemical corrosion techniques and galvanic corrosion techniques as per ASTM standards. Standard electrochemical tests (E-corr, I-corr, R-p and C-f) were conducted in bovine calf serum (BCS), as a function of alloys type and different pHs. Galvanic corrosion tests were conducted in BCS at a pH of 7.6. Alloy surfaces were characterized using white-light interferometry (WLI) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: The potentiodynamic test results exhibited the enhanced passive layer growth and a better corrosion resistance of Ti6Al4V compared to CoCrMo. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements demonstrated the influence of protein as a function of pH on corrosion mechanisms/kinetics. Galvanic coupling was not a major contributor to corrosion. SEM and WLI images demonstrated a significantly higher in surface roughness in CoCrMo after corrosion. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that Ti6Al4V shows superior corrosion behaviour to CoCrMo due to its strong passive layer, simulated joint fluid components can affect the electrochemical nature of the metal/electrolyte interface as a function of pH, and the galvanic effect of coupling CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V in a single joint is weak. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据