4.5 Article

Extremely low intrinsic non-axisymmetric field in KSTAR and its implications

期刊

NUCLEAR FUSION
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/55/4/043004

关键词

intrinsic error field; mode-locking; non-axisymmetric field; tokamak; RMP ELM suppression

资金

  1. Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [EN1501] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A surprisingly low level of intrinsic non-axisymmetric field (called 'error field') has been measured in KSTAR, suggesting at least an order of magnitude lower than in other major tokamaks. Specifically, the KSTAR was found to have an extremely low level of pitch resonant intrinsic error field at the m/n = 2/1 surface in the order of 10(-5) of the magnetic field at the geometric centre, instead of 10(-4) typically observed in other devices. Using a single array of in-vessel control coils (IVCCs) at the outboard midplane, the n = 1 intrinsic error field was diagnosed. Such a low level of intrinsic non-axisymmetric field as measured in KSTAR is less than or comparable to the Earth's magnetic field or a remanent field in the KSTAR plasma chamber. Considering that a very low level of n = 1 intrinsic error field (mostly associated with kink-resonance) helps the plasma to be less vulnerable to mode-locking, this might have allowed the n = 1 resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) currents (configured to be dominantly pitch-resonant for edge localized mode (ELM) suppression) to increase without invoking a kink-resonant mode-locking, consistent with experimental observation and poloidal mode spectra calculations in KSTAR. Further clarification of the influence of the intrinsic error field in terms of a 3D structure is expected to provide a solid foundation to understand the n = 1 RMP-driven ELM suppression uniquely observed in KSTAR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据