4.2 Article

Semiquantitative Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Markers in Multislice Computed Tomography of the Chest: Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 279-284

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181bbcff6

关键词

cardiovascular disease; observer variation; diagnostic chest CT

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research-Medical Sciences [40-00812-98-07-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the interobserver and intraobserver agreements for the semiquantitative assessment of markers of subclinical cardiovascular disease as identified by routine care, diagnostic computed tomography (CT) of the chest, to improve the quality of reporting of these incidental findings. Methods: Two observers independently evaluated 109 consecutive chest CT scans in routine care, clinical patients from one tertiary referral center. All nongated, contrast-enhanced scans were acquired on a 16-slice CT scanner. Images were scored for the presence of aortic wall abnormalities and calcifications of the coronary artery, the heart valves, the thoracic aorta, and the proximal supraaortic arteries. Furthermore, the presence of left ventricular scarring and elongation of the aorta were recorded. All markers were scored on a semiquantitative scale. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements are presented as weighted kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Interobserver and intraobserver agreements for individual markers were good to excellent, with weighted kappa coefficients of 0.54 to 0.89 for interobserver agreement and 0.55 to 0.96 for intraobserver agreement. Conclusions: Semiquantitative assessment of subclinical cardiovascular disease markers in routine care, diagnostic chest CT scans is possible with good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver agreements. Use of these definitions in clinical practice will enable a more standardized assessment and reporting of incidental findings in diagnostic chest CT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据