4.7 Article

Efficient multi-dimensional solution of PDEs using Chebyshev spectral methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 228, 期 5, 页码 1480-1503

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.10.043

关键词

Numerical linear algebra; Spectral methods; Partial differential equations; Discretized equations; Chebyshev polynomials; Quasi-inverse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A robust methodology is presented for efficiently solving partial differential equations using Chebyshev spectral techniques. It is well known that differential equations in one dimension can be solved efficiently with Chebyshev discretizations, O(N) operations for N-D unknowns, however this efficiency is lost in higher dimensions due to the coupling between modes. This paper presents the quasi-inverse technique (QIT), which combines optimizations of one-dimensional spectral differentiation matrices with Kronecker matrix products to build efficient multi-dimensional operators. This strategy results in O(N2D-1) operations for No unknowns, independent of the form of the differential operators. QIT is compared to the matrix diagonalization technique (MDT) of Haidvogel and Zang [D.B. Haidvogel, T. Zang, The accurate solution of Poisson's equation by expansion in Chebyshev polynomials, J. Comput. Phys. 30 (1979) 167-180] and Shen U. Shen, Efficient spectral-Galerkin method. II. Direct solvers of second- and fourth-order equations using Chebyshev polynomials, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 16 (1) (1995) 74-87]. While the cost for MDT and QIT are the same in two dimensions, there are significant differences. MDT utilizes an eigenvalue/eigenvector decomposition and can only be used for relatively simple differential equations. QIT is based upon intrinsic properties of the Chebyshev polynomials and is adaptable to linear PDEs with constant coefficients in simple domains. We present results for a standard suite of test problems, and discuss of the adaptability of QIT to more complicated problems. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据