4.4 Article

LEAP: Highly Accurate Prediction of Protein Loop Conformations by Integrating Coarse-Grained Sampling and Optimized Energy Scores with All-Atom Refinement of Backbone and Side Chains

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 335-341

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23509

关键词

loop modeling; coarse-grained energy function; energy minimization; Monte Carlo simulation; force field development

资金

  1. Japan Society [24570184]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM085003]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24570184] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prediction of protein loop conformations without any prior knowledge (ab initio prediction) is an unsolved problem. Its solution will significantly impact protein homology and template-based modeling as well as ab initio protein-structure prediction. Here, we developed a coarse-grained, optimized scoring function for initial sampling and ranking of loop decoys. The resulting decoys are then further optimized in backbone and side-chain conformations and ranked by all-atom energy scoring functions. The final integrated technique called loop prediction by energy-assisted protocol achieved a median value of 2.1 angstrom root mean square deviation (RMSD) for 325 12-residue test loops and 2.0 angstrom RMSD for 45 12-residue loops from critical assessment of structure-prediction techniques (CASP) 10 target proteins with native core structures (backbone and side chains). If all side-chain conformations in protein cores were predicted in the absence of the target loop, loop-prediction accuracy only reduces slightly (0.2 angstrom difference in RMSD for 12-residue loops in the CASP target proteins). The accuracy obtained is about 1 angstrom RMSD or more improvement over other methods we tested. The executable file for a Linux system is freely available for academic users at http://sparks-lab.org. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据