4.4 Article

Electronic fluxes during diels-alder reactions involving 1,2-benzoquinones: mechanistic insights from the analysis of electron localization function and catastrophe theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 33, 期 30, 页码 2400-2411

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23085

关键词

electron localization function; catastrophe theory; Diels-Alder reactions; 1; 2-benzoquinones; regioselectivity

资金

  1. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo/2009/053]
  2. Spanish Ministry Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2009-14541-C02, CTQ2009-11027/BQU]
  3. Fundacion Bancaja [P1.1B2010-10]
  4. Universitat Jaume
  5. Fundacion Bancaixa-UJI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By means of the joint use of electron localization function (ELF) and Thom's catastrophe theory, a theoretical analysis of the energy profile for the hetero-Diels-Alder reaction of 4-methoxy-1,2-benzoquinone 1 and methoxyethylene 2 has been carried out. The 12 different structural stability domains obtained by the bonding evolution theory have been identified as well as the bifurcation catastrophes (fold and cusp) responsible for the changes in the topology of the system. This analysis permits finding a relationship between the ELF topology and the evolution of the bond breaking/forming processes and electron pair rearrangements through the reaction progress in terms of the different ways of pairing up the electrons. The reaction mechanism corresponds to an asynchronous electronic flux; first, the O1?C5 bond is formed by the nucleophilic attack of the C5 carbon of the electron rich ethylene 2 on the most electrophilically activated carbonyl O1 oxygen of 1, and once the s bond has been completed, the formation process of the second O4?C6 bond takes place. In addition, the values of the local electrophilicity and local nucleophilcity indices in the framework of conceptual density functional theory accounts for the asychronicity of the process as well as for the observed regioselectivity. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据