4.4 Article

Intermolecular hydrogen bond energies in crystals evaluated using electron density properties: DFT computations with periodic boundary conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 33, 期 29, 页码 2303-2309

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23062

关键词

molecular crystals; H-bond enthalpies; energies; harmonic frequencies and IR intensities; electron-density analysis

资金

  1. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [10-03-00611]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-03-00583]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hydrogen bond (H-bond) energies are evaluated for 18 molecular crystals with 28 moderate and strong O?H...O bonds using the approaches based on the electron density properties, which are derived from the B3LYP/6-311G** calculations with periodic boundary conditions. The approaches considered explore linear relationships between the local electronic kinetic Gb and potential Vb densities at the H...O bond critical point and the H-bond energy EHB. Comparison of the computed EHB values with the experimental data and enthalpies evaluated using the empirical correlation of spectral and thermodynamic parameters (Iogansen, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 1999, 55, 1585) enables to estimate the accuracy and applicability limits of the approaches used. The Vb-EHB approach overestimates the energy of moderate H-bonds (EHB < 60 kJ/mol) by similar to 20% and gives unreliably high energies for crystals with strong H-bonds. On the other hand, the Gb-EHB approach affords reliable results for the crystals under consideration. The linear relationship between Gb and EHB is basis set superposition error (BSSE) free and allows to estimate the H-bond energy without computing it by means of the supramolecular approach. Therefore, for the evaluation of H-bond energies in molecular crystals, the Gb value can be recommended to be obtained from both density functional theory (DFT) computations with periodic boundary conditions and precise X-ray diffraction experiments. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据