4.4 Article

Assessment of TD-DFT- and TD-HF-Based Approaches for the Prediction of Exciton Coupling Parameters, Potential Energy Curves, and Electronic Characters of Electronically Excited Aggregates

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 1971-1981

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21781

关键词

perylene bisimide; SCS-CC2; TD-HF; TD-DFT; charge-transfer state; neutral excited state; electronic-coupling matrix-element; exciton energy transfer; exciton trapping mechanism

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GRK 1221]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Volkswagen Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability of linear response approaches such as time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TD-HF) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) for the prediction of the excited state properties of 3,4; 9,10-tetracarboxylic-perylene-bisimide (PBI) aggregates is investigated. A dimer model of PBI is investigated as a function of a torsional motion of the monomers, which was shown before to be an important intermolecular coordinate in these aggregates. The potential energy curves of the ground state and the two energetically lowest neutral excited and charge-transfer (CT) states were obtained with the spin-component scaling modification of the approximate coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles (SCS-CC2) method as a benchmark for dispersion corrected TD-HF and a range of TD-DFT approaches. The highly accurate SCS-CC2 results are used to assess the other, computationally less demanding methods. TD-HF predicts similar potential energy curves and transition dipole moments as SCS-CC2, as well as the correct order of neutral and CT states. This supports an exciton trapping mechanism, which was found on the basis of TD-HF data. However, the investigated TD-DFT methods provide generally the opposite character for the excited states. As a consequence, these TD-DFT results have unacceptably large errors for optical properties of these dye aggregates. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 32: 1971-1981, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据