4.4 Article

Performance of 3D-Space-Based Atoms-in-Molecules Methods for Electronic Delocalization Aromaticity Indices

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 386-395

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21621

关键词

electron sharing index; atoms-in-molecules; fuzzy-atom; Hirshfeld; PDI; Multicenter index; aromaticity; atomic partition

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation Center
  2. Marie Curie Fellowship, Seventh Framework Program [FP7/2007-2013, PIEF-GA-2008-221734]
  3. Polish Ministery of Science and Higher Education [N N204 215634]
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Accion Complementaria del MCI) [PCI2006-A7-0631]
  5. Spanish MICINN [CTQ2008-03077/BQU]
  6. Catalan DIUE [2009SGR637]
  7. Fund for Scientific Research in Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  8. Catalan DIUE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several definitions of an atom in a molecule (AIM) in three-dimensional (3D) space, including both fuzzy and disjoint domains, are used to calculate electron sharing indices (ESI) and related electronic aromaticity measures, namely, I-ring and multicenter indices (MCI), for a wide set of cyclic planar aromatic and nonaromatic molecules of different ring size. The results obtained using the recent iterative Hirshfeld scheme are compared with those derived from the classical Hirshfeld method and from Bader's quantum theory of atoms in molecules. For bonded atoms, all methods yield ESI values in very good agreement, especially for C-C interactions. In the case of nonbonded interactions, there are relevant deviations, particularly between fuzzy and QTAIM schemes. These discrepancies directly translate into significant differences in the values and the trends of the aromaticity indices. In particular, the chemically expected trends are more consistently found when using disjoint domains. Careful examination of the underlying effects reveals the different reasons why the aromaticity indices investigated give the expected results for binary divisions of 3D space. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 32: 386-395, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据