4.4 Article

Theory for Trivial Trajectory Parallelization of Multicanonical Molecular Dynamics and Application to a Polypeptide in Water

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1286-1297

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21710

关键词

generalized-ensemble method; free-energy landscape; density of states; canonical ensemble; explicit water; all-atom model; principle component analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20370061, 19570156]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) Japan [513-20051013, 21113006]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21113006, 20370061, 19570156] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trivial trajectory parallelization of multicanonical molecular dynamics (TTP-McMD) explores the conformational space of a biological system with multiple short runs of McMD starting from various initial structures. This method simply connects (i.e., trivially parallelizes) the short trajectories and generates a long trajectory. First, we theoretically prove that the simple trajectory connection satisfies a detailed balance automatically. Thus, the resultant long trajectory is regarded as a single multicanonical trajectory. Second, we applied TTP-McMD to an alanine decapeptide with an all-atom model in explicit water to compute a free-energy landscape. The theory imposes two requirements on the multiple trajectories. We have demonstrated that TTP-McMD naturally satisfies the requirements. The TTP-McMD produces the free-energy landscape considerably faster than a single-run McMD does. We quantitatively showed that the accuracy of the computed landscape increases with increasing the number of multiple runs. Generally, the free-energy landscape of a large biological system is unknown a priori. The current method is suitable for conformational sampling of such a large system to reduce the waiting time to obtain a canonical ensemble statistically reliable. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 32: 1286-1297, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据