4.5 Article

Rearrangement of the cone mosaic in the retina of the rat model of retinitis pigmentosa

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 520, 期 4, 页码 874-888

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22800

关键词

retinitis pigmentosa; cone mosaics; reorganization; retina

资金

  1. Fight for Sight
  2. National Science Foundation [0310723]
  3. National Eye Institute [EY016093, EY11170]
  4. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0310723] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In retinitis pigmentosa (RP), the death of cones normally follows some time after the degeneration of rods. Recently, surviving cones in RP have been studied and reported in detail. These cones undergo extensive remodeling in their morphology. Here we report an extension of the remodeling study to consider possible modifications of spatial-distribution patterns. For this purpose we used S334ter-line-3 transgenic rats, a transgenic model developed to express a rhodopsin mutation causing RP. In this study, retinas were collected at postnatal (P) days P530, 90, 180, and P600. We then immunostained the retinas to examine the morphology and distribution of cones and to quantify the total cone numbers. Our results indicate that cones undergo extensive changes in their spatial distribution to give rise to a mosaic comprising an orderly array of rings. These rings first begin to appear at P15 at random regions of the retina and become ubiquitous throughout the entire tissue by P90. Such distribution pattern loses its clarity by P180 and mostly disappears at P600, at which time the cones are almost all dead. In contrast, the numbers of cones in RP and normal conditions do not show significant differences at stages as late as P180. Therefore, rings do not form by cell death at their centers, but by cone migration. We discuss its possible mechanisms and suggest a role for hot spots of rod death and the remodeling of Muller cell process into zones of low density of photoreceptors. J. Comp. Neurol., 2012. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据