4.5 Article

Comparative Study of Pax2 Expression in Glial Cells in the Retina and Optic Nerve of Birds and Mammals

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 518, 期 12, 页码 2316-2333

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.22335

关键词

retina; Pax2; Muller glia; astrocytes; optic nerve

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute [EY016043, EY015480]
  2. OSU Graduate School

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the expression of Pax2 in mature retina or optic nerve. Here we probed for the expression of Pax2 in late stages of embryonic development and in mature chick retina. We find two distinct Pax2 isoforms expressed by cells within the retina and optic nerve. Surprisingly, Muller glia in central regions of the retina express Pax2, and levels of expression are decreased with increasing distance from the nerve head. In Muller glia, the expression levels of Pax2 are increased by acute retinal damage or treatment with growth factors. At the optic nerve, Pax2 is expressed by peripapillary glia, at the junction of the neural retina and optic nerve head and by glia within the optic nerve. In addition, we assayed for Pax2 expression in glial cells in mammalian retinas. In mammalian retinas, unlike the case in chick retina, the Muller glia do not express Pax2. Pax2-expressing cells are found in the optic nerve and astrocytes within the mouse retina. By comparison, Pax2-positive cells are not found within the guinea pig retina; Pax2-expressing glia are confined to the optic nerve. In dog and monkey (Macaca fascicularis), Pax2 is expressed by astrocytes that are scattered across inner retinal layers and by numerous glia within the optic nerve. Interestingly, Pax2-positive glial cells are found at the peripheral edge of the dog retina, but only in older animals. We conclude that the expression of Pax2 in the vertebrate eye is restricted to retinal astrocytes, peripapillary glia, and glia within the optic nerve. J. Comp. Neurol. 518:2316-2333, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据