4.7 Article

Nanoparticle ζ-potential measurements using tunable resistive pulse sensing with variable pressure

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 429, 期 -, 页码 45-52

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.013

关键词

Tunable pore; Resistive pulse sensing; Zeta-potential

资金

  1. New Zealand's Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (NERF) [C08X0806]
  2. MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C08X0806] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modern resistive pulse sensing techniques can be used to measure nanoparticle electrophoretic mobility, and hence zeta-potential. In contrast to conventional light scattering methods, resistive pulse sensing produces particle-by-particle data. We have used tunable resistive pulse sensing (TRPS) to compare methods for measuring the zeta-potential of carboxylated polystyrene nanoparticles. The five particle sets studied had nominal surface charge density (sigma) between 0 and -0.67 C M-2, and diameters in the range 160-230 nm. Data were collected with pressure in the range +/- 500 Pa applied across a tunable pore. In each experiment, pressure was varied either continuously or in discrete steps. Calculations of the zeta-potential were obtained by analysing both the rate and the full-width half maximum duration of resistive pulses. Data obtained from duration analyses were more reproducible than rate methods, yielding typical variations smaller than +/- 5 mV. When sigma was greater (less negative) than -0.32 C m(-2), all of the analysis methods studied yielded a monotonic relationship between zeta-potential and sigma. Complicated pulse data were observed near the pressure at which the net particle flux is zero, and these observations have been explored by examining competition between electrokinetic and pressure-driven transport. The typical difference between zeta-potentials obtained using TRPS and phase analysis light scattering was 15% (<5 mV), with an experimental error of similar to 10% attributable to both techniques. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据