4.7 Article

Fast adsorption of Cd2+ and Pb2+ by EGTA dianhydride (EGTAD) modified ramie fiber

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 434, 期 -, 页码 152-158

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.07.036

关键词

Modified ramie fiber; Adsorption; Heavy metals; EGTA dianhydride; Mercerization; Adsorption isotherm; Regeneration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271332]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Hunan Province, China [2012SK2021]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate [CX2012B138]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the removal of Cd2+ and Pb2+ from aqueous solutions was investigated using a novel chelating material. The first part described the synthesis of ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid dianhydride (EGTAD), mercerization treatment of ramie fiber (MRF), and the MRF was then reacted with EGTAD to prepare the new material (ERF). The obtained material was characterized by weight gain, SEM, FTIR, and elemental analysis. The results of FTIR and elemental analysis confirmed that ester bond, carboxyl and amine groups were introduced onto ERF. The adsorption capacity of metals on ERF was evaluated at different contact times, pH values, initial metal concentrations, and temperatures in the second part. The adsorption equilibrium was reached within 5 min for Cd2+ and Pb2+. Adsorption isotherm could be well fitted by the Langmuir model, and the maximum adsorption capacities were 159.11 and 273.78 mg g(-1) for Cd2+ and Pb2+ at 298 K, respectively. Thermodynamic analysis showed that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic. The molar ratio of adsorbed cation to grafted EGTA is close to 1.8:1, which confirmed that the adsorption was chemical process involving both surface chelation reaction and ion exchange. In addition, the absorbent was successfully regenerated using HCl and ultrasonic treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据