4.7 Article

Temperature and pH dual-responsive POEGMA-based coatings for protein adsorption

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 411, 期 -, 页码 247-256

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.08.007

关键词

Stimuli-responsive polymer coatings; Graft polymerization; Wettability; Protein adsorption; Time of Flight-Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the Polish Innovation Economy Operational Program [POIG.02.01.00-12-023/08]
  2. M. Smoluchowski KRAKOW SCIENTIFIC CONSORTIUM in the framework of the KNOW grant (FOCUS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(oligo(ethylene glycol)ethyl ether methacrylate (POEGMA246) coatings were successfully fabricated using novel approach via polymerization from oligoperoxide grafted to premodified glass substrate. Wettability, content and composition of coatings fabricated with different polymerization times were determined using contact angle measurements, ellipsometry and Time of Flight-Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (TOF-SIMS). Thermo- and pH-responsive properties of POEGMA246 coatings were found to depend significantly on concentration of the grafted POEGMA246. Coatings fabricated with polymerization time 30 h exhibit not only temperature- but also pH-dependence of wettability. Thermal response of wettability, measured between 20 and 32 degrees C, was prominent at pH 9 and 7 and diminished or was absent at pH 5 and 3, indicating a transition between hydrated loose coils and hydrophobic collapsed chains, blocked at low pH. Protein adsorption, observed by fluorescence microscopy and analyzed semi-quantitatively using integral geometry approach, decreased dramatically for model protein (lentil lectin labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate) at transition from pH 5 to pH 9, showing only very weak thermal-dependence. Strong protein adsorption response to pH and very weak one to temperature was confirmed by TOF-SIMS and Principal Component Analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据