4.7 Article

Layer by layer chitosan/alginate coatings on poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for antifouling protection and Folic acid binding to achieve selective cell targeting

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 345, 期 2, 页码 241-247

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.02.004

关键词

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles; Chitosane; Alginate; Layer by layer; Antifouling protection; Targeting; Cellular uptake

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [MAT 2007-60458]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [50873087]
  3. Major State Basic Research Program of China [2005CB623902]
  4. National High-tech Research and Development Program [2006AA03Z442, 2006AA02A140]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) composed of two natural polysaccharides-chitosan (Chi) and alginate (Alg) were deposited by Layer by layer (LbL) assembly on top of biocompatible poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs). Folic acid (FA) or FA grafted poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG-FA) were covalently bounded to the PEMs via carbodiimide chemistry. The assembly of biocompatible PEMs was monitored on planar surfaces by means of the quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D) technique and on top of PLGA NPs by means of c-potential measurements. BSA was used as model protein to characterize protein adsorption on PEMs. QCM-D showed protein deposition could not be observed on the Chi/Alg multilayer, for both Chitosan and Alginate as top layers. Finally, cellular uptake experiments were carried out by co-culture of HepG2 cells in presence of NPs. Flow Cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were used to investigate the influence of the surface chemistry of the NPs on uptake. For the HepG2 cell line significantly less uptake of PLGA NPs coated with Chi/Alg than the bare NPs was observed but the uptake increased after attachment of FA molecules. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据