4.6 Article

Clinical features of radiologically confirmed pneumonia due to adenovirus in children

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 7-12

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.08.021

关键词

Adenovirus; Children; Pneumonia

类别

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG 470131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinical features of radiologically confirmed pneumonia due to adenovirus in children have not been comprehensively evaluated. Objective: To describe the detailed clinical features of radiologically confirmed adenovirus-associated pneumonia in children. Study design: Of 3298 children with a throat virus culture positive for adenovirus treated at a university-affiliated hospital, from January 2000 to June 2008, in northern Taiwan, 80 hospitalized children (2.4%) with radiologically confirmed pneumonia were identified. From four children with incomplete medical records, only demographics were included for analysis. Results: The median age was 2.97 years, ranging from 25 days to 14 years. Seventy-three patients (96%) had fever, with a median duration of 7 days. The three most common respiratory symptoms were cough (99%), rhinorrhea (82%) and dyspnea (42%). Gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded in 80% of the patients, and neurologic symptoms in four children. Leukocytosis (WBC >= 15,000/mu L) was noted in 19 (25%) patients. Only six patients (8%) had a normal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) value (<5 mg/L), while 48 patients (63%) had a CRP level >40 mg/L. Seventeen (21%) children required intensive care. Seventy-three patients (96%) recovered uneventfully. Sequelae were seen in two patients and death in 1. Of the 69 isolates with serotyping determination, seven serotypes were identified, with a predominant serotype (type 3 for 73%). Conclusion: Less than 5% of the children with adenoviral infection had radiologically confirmed patch pneumonia. The manifestation of pneumonia caused by adenovirus was similar to that of bacterial pneumonia. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据