4.5 Article

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Trichotillomania

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 71, 期 10, 页码 1336-1343

出版社

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.09m05114gre

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  3. Cephalon
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Janssen-Ortho
  7. National Institutes of Health
  8. Novartis
  9. Pfizer
  10. Sanofi-Aventis
  11. Servier
  12. Wyeth-Ayerst
  13. Eli Lilly Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Trichotillomania has been considered as part of the obsessive-compulsive disorder spectrum; however, trichotillomania treatment with obsessive-compulsive disorder medications has largely been unsuccessful. Objective: To determine whether a dopaminergic treatment as used in tics and burette's syndrome would be effective in trichotillomania. Method: Twenty-five participants with DSM-IV trichotillomania participated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of flexible-dose olanzapine for trichotillomania. Recruitment occurred between August 2001 and December 2005, and follow-up was completed in February 2006. The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, and secondary measures of efficacy included the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale for Trichotillomania (TTM-YBOCS) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale. Results: Eleven of 13 participants (85%) in the olanzapine group and 2 of 12 (17%) in the placebo group were considered responders according to the CGI-I (P=.001). There was a significant change from baseline to end point in the TTM-YBOCS (P < .01) and the CGI-S (P < .001). The mean +/- SD dose of olanzapine at end point was 10.8 +/- 5.7 mg/d. Twenty-one of 25 patients (84%) reported at least 1 adverse event, but no adverse events resulted in early withdrawal from the study. Conclusion: Olanzapine seems to be a safe and effective treatment for primary DSM-IV trichotillomania.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据