4.1 Article

Population Pharmacokinetics of Golimumab, an Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Human Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 1056-1070

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1177/0091270009339192

关键词

Tumor necrosis factor; monoclonal antibody; golimumab; population pharmacokinetics; psoriatic arthritis

资金

  1. Centocor Research and Development, Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The population pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered golimumab (50 mg or 100 mg every 4 weeks) were characterized in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in GO-REVEAL, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. A total of 2029 serum golimumab concentrations from 337 patients were analyzed using NONMEM. A 1-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and elimination was chosen to describe the observed concentration-time data. For a patient of standard weight (70 kg), the population estimates (typical value +/- standard error) for golimumab pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: apparent clearance = 1.38 +/- 0.04 L/d, apparent volume of distribution = 24.9 +/- 1.04 L, and absorption rate constant = 0.908 +/- 0.121 per day. The between-subject variability was 37.6% in apparent clearance and 37.9% in apparent volume of distribution. Body weight, antibody-to-golimumab status, baseline C-reactive protein level, and smoking status were identified as significant covariates on apparent clearance. Body weight was also a significant covariate on apparent volume of distribution. None of the concomitant medications examined (methotrexate, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) were significant covariates on apparent clearance, although the median trough golimumab concentration in patients receiving methotrexate was higher than for those not receiving methotrexate. These significant covariates account for part of the variability in systemic exposure to golimumab observed in patients with PsA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据