4.6 Article

A single session of motivational interviewing as an additive means to improve adherence in periodontal infection control: a randomized controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 947-954

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01926.x

关键词

chronic periodontitis; motivational interview; oral hygiene behaviour

资金

  1. TUA-research, Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. foundation Swedish Patent Revenue Fund for Research in Preventive Odontology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim To evaluate the effect of a single session of motivational interviewing (MI) on self-performed periodontal infection control. Material and Methods A randomized, examiner masked, controlled clinical trial of 6-month duration was performed involving 44 patients with chronic periodontitis, referred for periodontal treatment. At baseline, all subjects were examined concerning marginal gingival bleeding (MBI) and plaque (PI). Test subjects received a single MI-session before initiation of the periodontal treatment. Otherwise, all patients followed the same treatment protocol for conventional educational intervention and non-surgical periodontal therapy. Efficacy variables for evaluation of self-performed periodontal infection control were MBI (primary variable) and PI. Results The MI intervention resulted in a negligible decrease (34%) in MBI and PI that was not significantly different from the changes observed in the control group without any intervention. Neither was any additive effect of the initial MI-session found on the standard of oral hygiene subsequent to conventional treatment. A desirable MBI score of =20% at the end of treatment was associated with being a female patient, whereas high plaque scores at baseline counteracted a corresponding desirable final PI of =20%. Conclusion A single freestanding MI session as a prelude to conventional periodontal treatment had no significant effect on the individuals' standard of self-performed periodontal infection control in a short-term perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据