4.6 Article

Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand antagonists inhibit tissue inflammation and bone loss in experimental periodontitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
卷 38, 期 11, 页码 1029-1036

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01780.x

关键词

bone loss; experimental periodontitis; inflammation; Kavain; osteoprotegerin-Fc; receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand antagonist; receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B-Fc

资金

  1. NIH/NIDCR [R01 DE014079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of anti-bone resorptive agents and an anti-inflammatory compound in murine Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis)-induced periodontitis. Material and Methods: Six randomly assigned groups were administered vehicle (saline, control) (n = 6), P. gingivalis infection only (untreated) (n = 6), human-Fc (n = 4), Kavain (n = 6), OPG-Fc (n = 6) and Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)-Fc (n = 6) intraperitoneally at day 0, 3 and 7. Animals were euthanized on day 10 and subjected to comprehensive histomorphometric analysis. To capture the progress of inflammation, serum samples were collected at days 0, 3, 7 and 10 for levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Results: Compared with control group, OPG-Fc, RANK-Fc and Kavain treatment showed significant bone loss reduction with OPG-Fc performing better than RANK-Fc or Kavain. Epithelial down-growth showed significant reduction in treatment groups with OPG-Fc performing better than RANK-Fc or Kavain. Finally, Kavain, OPG-Fc and RANK-Fc-treated mice displayed reduced inflammatory cell counts and cytokine expression particularly at day 7 postinfection. Conclusions: RANKL antagonists and Kavain effectively reduced alveolar bone loss in P. gingivalis-induced periodontitis in our mice model. Compared with RANK-Fc, Kavain-treated animals showed milder improvement of bone and connective tissue inflammation. Therapeutic implications in the prevention of periodontal bone loss are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据