4.7 Article

Addition of Lomustine to Idarubicin and Cytarabine Improves the Outcome of Elderly Patients With De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Report From the GOELAMS

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 18, 页码 3028-3034

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.4648

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose No significant improvement in treatment outcome has been seen in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) over the past 20 years. This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic factors for complete remission (CR) and survival in older patients with AML. Patients and Methods The study involved 847 patients older than 60 years enrolled onto three trials carried out in France between 1995 and 2005. Induction therapy consisted of idarubicin (8 mg/m2, days 1 through 5) and cytarabine (100 mg/m2, days 1 through 7; group I, 339 patients) or the same drugs plus lomustine (200 mg/m2 orally on day 1; group II, 508 patients). Consolidation therapy consisted of anthracycline and cytarabine courses at lower doses, preceded or not by a first course of intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results The rate of CR was significantly higher in patients in group II compared with group I (68% v 58%; P = .002). The rate of toxic death was similar in the two groups. In multivariate analysis, two prognostic factors were linked to CR: nonadverse cytogenetic (P = .003) and addition of lomustine to induction chemotherapy (P = .002). Median overall survival was significantly improved in patients treated with lomustine (median and SE, 12.7 +/- 2.2 months v 8.7 +/- 2.7 months; P = .004). In multivariate analysis, five prognostic factors positively affected overall survival: addition of lomustine (P = .002), age <= 69 years (P = .001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status lower than 2 (P = .002), French-American-British subgroup 1/2 (P = .02), and nonadverse cytogenetic (P = .001). Conclusion Lomustine improves the rate of CR and survival in elderly patients with de novo AML when added to standard induction therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据