4.7 Article

Analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA Gene Internal Transcribed Spacer Region in Klebsiella Species

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 3555-3563

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00927-08

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2006BAK02A14, 2006AA06Z409, 2006AA020703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of Klebsiella spp., including Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. ozaenae, Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. rhinoscleromatis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella planticola, Klebsiella terrigena, and Klebsiella ornithinolytica, were characterized, and the feasibility of using ITS sequences to discriminate Klebsiella species and subspecies was explored. A total of 336 ITS sequences from 21 representative strains and 11 clinical isolates of Klebsiella were sequenced and analyzed. Three distinct ITS types-ITSnone (without tRNA genes), ITSglu [with a tRNA(Glu (UUC)) gene], and ITSile + ala [with tRNA(Ile (GAU)) and tRNA(Ala (UGC)) genes] - were detected in all species except for K. pneumoniae subsp. rhinoscleromatis, which has only ITSglu and ITSile + ala. The presence of ITSnone in Enterobacteriaceae had never been reported before. Both the length and the sequence of each ITS type are highly conserved within the species, with identity levels from 0.961 to 1.000 for ITSnone, from 0.967 to 1.000 for ITSglu, and from 0.968 to 1.000 for ITSile + ala. Interspecies sequence identities range from 0.775 to 0.989 for ITSnone, from 0.798 to 0.997 for ITSglu, and from 0.712 to 0.985 for ITSile + ala. Regions with significant interspecies variations but low intraspecies polymorphisms were identified; these may be targeted in the design of probes for the identification of Klebsiella to the species level. Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS regions reveals the relationships among Klebsiella species similarly to that based on 16S rRNA genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据