4.8 Article

Syntaxin-binding protein STXBP5 inhibits endothelial exocytosis and promotes platelet secretion

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 124, 期 10, 页码 4503-4516

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI71245

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/NHLBI [R21 HL108372]
  2. HHMI Med-into-Grad Fellowship in Cardiovascular Sciences at the Aab Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Rochester
  3. American Heart Association [14GRNT19020033, 0835446N, 13PRE17050105]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293130] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In humans, vWF levels predict the risk of myocardial infarction and thrombosis; however, the factors that influence vWF levels are not completely understood. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified syntaxin-binding protein 5 (STXBP5) as a candidate gene linked to changes in vWF plasma levels, though the functional relationship between STXBPS and vWF is unknown. We hypothesized that STXBP5 inhibits endothelial cell exocytosis. We found that STXBP5 is expressed in human endothelial cells and colocalizes with and interacts with syntaxin 4. In human endothelial cells reduction of STXBP5 increased exocytosis of vWF and P-selectin. Mice lacking Stxbp5 had higher levels of vWF in the plasma, increased P-selectin translocation, and more platelet-endothelial interactions, which suggests that STXBP5 inhibits endothelial exocytosis. However, Stxbp5 KO mice also displayed hemostasis defects, including prolonged tail bleeding times and impaired mesenteric arteriole and carotid artery thrombosis. Furthermore, platelets from Stxbp5 KO mice had defects in platelet secretion and activation; thus, STXBP5 inhibits endothelial exocytosis but promotes platelet secretion. Our study reveals a vascular function for STXBP5, validates the functional relevance of a candidate gene identified by GWAS, and suggests that variation within STXBPS is a genetic risk for venous thromboembolic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据