4.8 Article

Microglial activation underlies cerebellar deficits produced by repeated cannabis exposure

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 123, 期 7, 页码 2816-2831

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI67569

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [BFU2008-03390, BFU2008-00899, SAF2007-64062, SAF2011-29864, SAF2009-07309, BFU2012-33500]
  2. European Commission (PHECOMP) [LSHM-CT-2007-037669]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (RTA-RETICS) [RD06/001/001]
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR2009-SGR00731]
  5. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [090910]
  6. ICREA Academia
  7. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic cannabis exposure can lead to cerebellar dysfunction in humans, but the neurobiological mechanisms involved remain incompletely understood. Here, we found that in mice, subchronic administration of the psychoactive component of cannabis, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), activated cerebellar microglia and increased the expression of neuroinflammatory markers, including IL-1 beta. This neuroinflammatory phenotype correlated with deficits in cerebellar conditioned learning and fine motor coordination. The neuroinflammatory phenotype was readily detectable in the cerebellum of mice with global loss of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R, Cb1(-/-) mice) and in mice lacking CB1R in the cerebellar parallel fibers, suggesting that CB1R downregulation in the cerebellar molecular layer plays a key role in THC-induced cerebellar deficits. Expression of CB2 cannabinoid. receptor (CB2R) and Il1b mRNA was increased under neuroinflammatory conditions in activated CD11b-positive microglial cells. Furthermore, administration of the immunosuppressant minocycline or an inhibitor of IL-1 beta receptor signaling prevented the deficits in cerebellar function in Cb1(-/-) and THC-withdrawn mice. Our results suggest that cerebellar microglial activation plays a crucial role in the cerebellar deficits induced by repeated cannabis exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据