4.8 Article

Prognostically relevant gene signatures of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 517-525

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI65833

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Medicine
  2. Novartis
  3. NIH [U24CA143867, U24CA143883]
  4. Chapman Foundation
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA121941, U24CA143883, P30CA016672, P30CA008748, U24CA143867, P30CA016056, U24CA143799] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [U54HG003067] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007753, R01GM074024] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of the high risk of recurrence in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGS-OvCa), the development of outcome predictors could be valuable for patient stratification. Using the catalog of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we developed subtype and survival gene expression signatures, which, when combined, provide a prognostic model of HGS-OvCa classification, named Classification of Ovarian Cancer (CLOVAR). We validated CLOVAR on an independent dataset consisting of 879 HGS-OvCa expression profiles. The worst outcome group, accounting for 23% of all cases, was associated with a median survival of 23 months and a platinum resistance rate of 63%, versus a median survival of 46 months and platinum resistance rate of 23% in other cases. Associating the outcome prediction model with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status, residual disease after surgery, and disease stage further optimized outcome classification. Ovarian cancer is a disease in urgent need of more effective therapies. The spectrum of outcomes observed here and their association with CLOVAR signatures suggests variations in underlying tumor biology. Prospective validation of the CLOVAR model in the context of additional prognostic variables may provide a rationale for optimal combination of patient and treatment regimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据