4.8 Article

Role of dynamin, synaptojanin, and endophilin in podocyte foot processes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 122, 期 12, 页码 4401-4411

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI65289

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [DK083294, DK093629, R37NS036251, DK082700, DK45735]
  2. Norman Coplon Satellite Healthcare Grant
  3. NIH, George O'Brien Kidney Center at Yale [P30DK079310]
  4. PRIN
  5. Cariplo
  6. Telethon
  7. Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro
  8. European Molecular Biology Organization
  9. Epilepsy Foundation
  10. NIH MSTP TG [T32GM07205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podocytes are specialized cells that play an integral role in the renal glomerular filtration barrier via their foot processes. The foot processes form a highly organized structure, the disruption of which causes nephrotic syndrome. Interestingly, several similarities have been observed between mechanisms that govern podocyte organization and mechanisms that mediate neuronal synapse development. Dynamin, synaptojanin, and endophilin are functional partners in synaptic vesicle recycling via interconnected actions in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and actin dynamics in neurons. A role of dynamin in the maintenance of the kidney filtration barrier via an action on the actin cytoskeleton of podocytes was suggested. Here we used a conditional double-KO of dynamin 1 (Dnm1) and Dnm2 in mouse podocytes to confirm dynamin's role in podocyte foot process maintenance. In addition, we demonstrated that while synaptojanin 1 (Synj1) KO mice and endophilin 1 (Sh3gl2), endophilin 2 (Sh3gl1), and endophilin 3 (Sh3gl3) triple-KO mice had grossly normal embryonic development, these mutants failed to establish a normal filtration barrier and exhibited severe proteinuria due to abnormal podocyte foot process formation. These results strongly implicate a protein network that functions at the interface between endocytosis and actin at neuronal synapses in the formation and maintenance of the kidney glomerular filtration barrier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据