4.8 Article

The TNFR family members OX40 and CD27 link viral virulence to protective T cell vaccines in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 121, 期 1, 页码 296-307

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI42056

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [CA91837, AI67341, AI77079]
  2. Center for Infectious Disease at the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA091837] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R21AI077079, R56AI067341, R01AI067341, R01AI087734] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induction of CD8(+) T cell immunity is a key characteristic of an effective vaccine For safety reasons, human vaccination strategies largely use attenuated nonreplicating or weakly replicating pox-virus-based vectors, but these often elicit poor CD8(+) T cell immunity and might not result in optimal protection Recent studies have suggested that virulence is directly linked to immunogenicity, but the molecular mechanisms underlying optimal CD8(+) T cell responses remain to be defined Here, using natural and recombinant vaccinia virus (VACV) strains, we have shown in mice that VACV strains of differing virulence induce distinct levels of T cell memory because of the differential use of TNF receptor (TNFR) family costimulatory receptors With strongly replicating e, virulent) VACV, the TNFR family costimulatory receptors OX40 (also known as CD134) and CD27 were engaged and promoted the generation of high numbers of memory CD8(+) T cells, which protected against a lethal virus challenge in the absence of other mechanisms, including antibody and help from CD4(+) T cells In contrast, weakly replicating e, low-virulence) VACV strains were poor at eliciting protective CD8(+) T cell memory, as only the Ig family costimulatory receptor CD28 was engaged, and not OX40 or CD27 Our results suggest that the virulence of a virus dictates costimulatory receptor usage to determine the level of protective CD8(+) T cell immunity

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据