4.6 Article

Therapy with TLR7 Agonists Induces Lymphopenia: Correlating Pharmacology to Mechanism in a Mouse Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 1082-1092

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-012-9687-y

关键词

Lymphopenia; TLR7; interferon; mouse; pharmacology

资金

  1. Pfizer Global Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic TLR7 agonists have been proposed as oral replacements for interferon alpha (IFN alpha) therapy in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. However, adverse effects, such as lymphopenia and cardiovascular irregularities, have been observed in the clinical following treatment with TLR7 agonists. We wished to understand and characterise the relationship between TLR7 agonism and adverse effects. We compared responses to two prototypic TLR7 agonists (Resiquimod: R-848; and PF-04878691) in a mouse model and compared the responses to treatment with IFN alpha. We measured clinically relevant adverse effects such as lymphopenia and cardiovascular irregularities and related them to plasma drug levels and clinically relevant efficacy biomarkers such as the pro-inflammatory cytokine IP-10, 2'5'OAS and TLR7 receptor expression. By 2 h post dose all agents had induced a dose-dependent transient lymphopenia. IFN alpha increased heart rate immediately following dosing, persisting for 5 h, whilst PF-04878691 induced significant reductions in blood pressure. Lymphopenia co-incided with maximum plasma drug levels, raised levels of IP-10 and the auto-induction of TLR7 expression in the blood and lymph nodes. Peak levels of 2'5'OAS occurred at 24 h post-dose and only at doses which also induced lymphopenia. We conclude that systemic delivery of TLR7 agonists or IFN alpha induces similar exaggerated pharmacology, consistent with there being a narrow therapeutic window between efficacy and safety. This clinically validated mouse model will help to investigate whether more potent agonists or optimised dosing schedules, will be successful strategies for targeting TLR7 in patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据