4.4 Article

Three-Combination Probiotics Therapy in Children With Salmonella and Rotavirus Gastroenteritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 37-42

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828f1c6e

关键词

probiotics; gastroenteritis; diarrhea; rotavirus; Salmonella

资金

  1. Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital [VGHKS98-081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goals:Quantitative Vesikari scales and qualitative severe diarrhea (Vesikari scale 11) assessments were used to grade the Salmonella-induced and rotavirus-induced gastroenteritis severity. A significant reduction in severe diarrhea (Vesikari score 11) was used to evaluate the efficacy of three-combination probiotics (BIO-THREE).Background:Several studies have shown that rotavirus and Salmonella infections are the leading causes of infectious gastroenteritis. Although probiotics have been effective in some studies, the use of 3-combination formulation probiotics is rare.Study:This single-center, open-label, randomized, controlled trial included 159 patients (age range, 3 mo to 14 y) hospitalized with infectious gastroenteritis between February 2009 and October 2010.Results:Patients were grouped according to the pathogen identified (48, Salmonella; 42, rotavirus; and 69, unknown origin). The total diarrhea duration was significantly shorter for children who received BIO-THREE (P<0.0001). After BIO-THREE administration, there were significantly less intervention group patients with severe diarrhea at intervention day 3. Vesikari scale or diarrhea frequency results did not reveal significant differences between groups (except for day 5 in patients with rotavirus), and there were no significant changes in other clinical parameters or the length of hospital stay.Conclusions:Seven-day BIO-THREE administration demonstrated high efficacy and safety in infants and children with severe gastroenteritis. The incidence of severe gastroenteritis was significantly reduced in the rotavirus origin and BIO-THREE intervention groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据