4.4 Article

High prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in medical outpatients in Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 1010-1016

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318150d006

关键词

irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Rome II Modular Questionnaire; outpatient; stress

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture
  2. Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labour of Japan
  3. IBS Club
  4. Abbott Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Goals: The prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) among Japanese patients who visit hospitals departments of internal medicine is thought to be high. However, no clear statistical evidence has been provided to support such a claim. We tested the hypotheses that the prevalence of IBS in medical outpatients clinics in Japan is high. and that IBS patients feel more psychosocial stress than patients without IBS. Study: The subjects in this study were 633 patients who visited participating physicians. Patients were asked to fill in the Japanese version of the Rome II Modular Questionnaire (RIIMQ) for IBS diagnosis. the Sell-reported Irritable Bowel Syndrome Questionnaire (SIBSQ) for severity of the disease and the demographic quetionnaire for perceived stress and life style. Results: Rome II-defined IBS was diagnosed in 196 patients 31%). Analysis of variance revealed significant difference in the IBS scores of SIBSQ among IBS subjects (39.0 +/- 11.1, mean +/- SD), functional bowel disorder subjects (27.1 +/- 10.2), and normal subjects (24.0 +/- 10.0, P < 0.01). The prevalence of IBS depending oil age formed 2 peaks, one among adolescents and the other among the elderly. IBS patients had significantly more perceived stress (P < 0.0001), irregular sleep habit (P < 0.0001 and irregular meal habit (p < 0.0001) than those without IBS. Conclusions: The prevalence of IBS among medical outpatients in Japan is high (31%). IBS subjects among medically ill patients are thought to have more perceived stress and less regular life styles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据